Legal Opinion
Carr v. Christie
Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)
Decided May 7, 1998No. 03-97-00350-CVPublishedCited by 19 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
POWERS, Justice.
Plaintiff Bradley Carr appeals from a summary judgment that he take nothing by his actions against Joe Christie and Galvanix Corporation. We will reverse the judgment and remand the cause to the trial court.
THE CONTROVERSY
Carr worked for Linda Marek, owner of Marek’s Battery Maintainers, from 1992 until 1994. The Marek firm manufactured battery products invented by Albert Marek. Carr was apparently instrumental in expanding the small business during his employment.
Linda Marek determined to sell the business. Marek began negotiating with Joe Christie, a prospective purchaser.…
2Cases cited43 opinions
- Coker v. CokerTexas Supreme Court · 1983
- Formosa Plastics Corp. USA v. Presidio Engineers and Contractors, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1998
- Arthur Andersen & Co. v. Perry Equipment Corp.Texas Supreme Court · 1997
- DeSantis v. Wackenhut Corp.Texas Supreme Court · 1990
- Columbia Gas Transmission Corp. v. New Ulm Gas, Ltd.Texas Supreme Court · 1996
38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Haase v. GlaznerTexas Supreme Court · 2002
- Amouri v. Southwest Toyota, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)2000
- Sonnichsen v. Baylor University, Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco)2001
- Lam v. PHUONG NGUYEN, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)2011
- Allamon v. Acuity Specialty Products, Inc.District Court, E.D. Texas · 2012
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.