Legal Opinion

Miss Pat Fashions, Inc. v. United States

United States Customs Court

Decided July 15, 1969No. C.D. 3867Published

1Opinion of the Court

Foed, Judge:

The cases listed in schedule “A”, annexed hereto and made a part hereof, consolidated for the purpose of trial, challenge *21the action of the collector of customs in assessing duty on certain blouses at the rate of 45 per centum ad valorem under the provisions of paragraph 1529(a), Tariff Act of 1930, as modified by the Torquay Protocol to the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade, 86 Treas. Dec. 121, T.D. 52739. The blouses designated G.H. 101 were considered to be in part of trimming. The blouses designated as G.H. 202, those of which are contested,* were considered to be in part…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Starlight Trading, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1960
  2. Toyomenka, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1963
  3. Starlight Trading, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1965
  4. Starlight Trading, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1966
  5. Marubeni Iida (America), Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1969

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API