Legal Opinion

Starlight Trading, Inc. v. United States

United States Customs Court

Decided April 19, 1965No. 69253; protest 62/7120 (New York)PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Ford, Judge:

Plaintiff herein protests the classification by the collector of customs of certain ladies’ cotton blouses, described on the invoice as item SS 033, under the provisions of paragraph 1529(a) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as modified 'by the Torquay Protocol to the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade, 86 Treas. Dec. 121, T.D. 52739, as wearing apparel in part of trimming and assessed with duty at the rate of 45 per centum ad valorem.

Plaintiff contends that the cotton blouses involved herein are not trimmed and are, accordingly, dutiable at only 20 per centum ad valorem under the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Starlight Trading, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1960
  2. Toyomenka, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1963

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Starlight Trading, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1966
  2. Shalom Baby-Wear, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1972
  3. Shalom Baby-Wear, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1969
  4. George S. Bailey Hat Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1968
  5. Miss Pat Fashions, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1969

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API