Legal Opinion
Barry v. Merriman
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided January 29, 1926PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtKelly, P. J.
The defendant, appellant, Hotels Corporation moved pursuant to rule 106 of the Rules of Civil Practice for an order dismissing the complaint as to said defendant, upon the ground that it does not state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action against said defendant. The motion was denied at Special Term and the defendant Hotels Corporation appeals from the order.
The complaint alleges that said defendant is a domestic corporation engaged in business in the city of New York, and that in connection with its business it owned and conducted the Hotel Commodore in said city; that the…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Laubheim v. De Koninglyke Nederlandsche Stoomboot MaatschappyNew York Court of Appeals · 1887
- Clancy v. BarkerCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1904
- Kelly v. Board of EducationAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1920
- Rosenberg v. New York Central RailroadAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1917
3Cited by2 opinions
- Barber v. Princess Hotels International, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1987
- Bristol v. ErnstAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1941