Legal Opinion

Clancy v. Barker

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided May 28, 1904No. 1,941PublishedCited by 34 opinions

In Error to the Circuit Court of the United States for the District of Nebraska.

1Opinion of the Court

SANBORN, Circuit Judge.

This case was determined in the lower court on a demurrer to the evidence; the trial court holding, on the conclusion of the plaintiff’s testimony, that there was no substantial evidence warranting a recovery. It accordingly directed a verdict in favor of the defendants. This action was taken on testimony which tended to establish, and did establish, the following facts:

Freeman Clancy, in whose behalf the action is brought, at the time of the accident hereafter described, was about six years old, and was stopping with his parents at the Barker Hotel, in the city of…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Cohens v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1821
  2. Craker v. Chicago & Northwestern Railway Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1875
  3. Goddard v. Grand Trunk RailwaySupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1869
  4. Stewart v. . Brooklyn and Crosstown R.R. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1882
  5. Dickson v. WaldronIndiana Supreme Court · 1893

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by34 opinions

  1. Slater v. Advance Thresher Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1906
  2. Klim v. JonesDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1970
  3. Penas v. Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1910
  4. Valeri v. Pullman Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1914
  5. Jackson v. Chicago, R. I. & P. Ry. Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1910

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API