Legal Opinion
United States v. Dornau
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided June 4, 1973No. 69 Cr. 718PublishedCited by 34 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
METZNER, District Judge:
A hearing was held on defendants’ motion to dismiss the indictment because allegedly it was founded on testimony given by defendants in bankruptcy proceedings in Florida pursuant to a grant of immunity. Section 7a(10) of the Bankruptcy Act (11 U.S.C. § 25).
The indictment against thése defendants contains 45 counts. The first 29 counts concern only defendant Fred Dornau and charge him with defrauding the government by filing false invoices (18 U.S.C. § 287). Count 30 charges this same defendant with uttering and publishing as true a forged government contract (18 U.S.C.…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Kastigar v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Murphy v. Waterfront Commission of New York HarborSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- United States v. Gary R. McDanielCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1972
- United States v. DornauDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1973
3Cited by34 opinions
- United States v. Oliver L. NorthCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1990
- United States v. Barbara HintonCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1977
- United States v. Gary R. McDanielCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1973
- United States v. Harry KurzerCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1976
- United States v. Peter DornauCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1974
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.