Legal Opinion
Morel v. Daimler Chrysler AG
District Court, D. Puerto Rico
Decided September 28, 2007No. Civil 05-2162 (FAB)PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
BESOSA, District Judge.
On December 23, 2006, Plaintiff Fernando Roman Concepcion died. As a result of his death, on February 1, 2007, plaintiffs Carmen Morel and Jose Roman (plaintiffs) filed a Motion for Substitution pursuant to Rule 25(a)(1) requesting to be substituted as proper parties for the causes of actions claimed by Fernando Roman for his own pain and suffering. Those claims had been assigned to them prior to Mr. Roman Concepcion’s death in a “confidential retainer agreement.” In other words, plaintiffs’ motion let it be known for the first time that, prior to his…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Betty v. Pace, as Administratrix of the Estate of Floyd J. Pace, Jr., Deceased v. Southern Express CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1969
- Aerotech, Inc. v. Estes IndustriesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1997
- John Doe v. Urohealth Systems, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2000
- Tyco Laboratories, Inc. v. Koppers Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1980
- Consejo de Titulares del Condominio Orquídeas A, B y C v. Corporación de Renovación Urbana y ViviendaSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1993
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Camacho-Albert v. MENDEZ & CO., INC.District Court, D. Puerto Rico · 2008