Legal Opinion
John Doe v. Urohealth Systems, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the First Circuit
Decided June 26, 2000No. 99-1432PublishedCited by 70 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
STAHL, Circuit Judge.
Defendant-appellant Urohealth Systems, Inc. (“Urohealth”) appeals the district court’s order, entered pursuant to Fed. R.Civ.P. 41(a)(2), granting plaintiff-appel-lee John Doe’s motion to dismiss voluntarily and without prejudice this diversity suit. We reverse and remand.
I
In the late summer of 1995, John Doe sought treatment for impotence and consulted a urologist, Dr. Jacques Susset, who recommended the surgical implantation of a penile prosthesis. Doe met with another urologist, Dr. Alan Podis, who suggested that implantation of the Dura-II semirigid penile prosthesis…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Salve Regina College v. RussellSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Cone v. West Virginia Pulp & Paper Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Hart Steel Co. v. Railroad Supply Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1917
- Frances Kern v. Txo Production CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1984
- Grover v. Eli Lilly & Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1994
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by70 opinions
- Beth B. Pontenberg v. Boston ScientificCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2001
- Bridgeport Music, Inc. v. Universal-MCA Music Publishing, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2009
- Brown v. BaekeCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2005
- Youssif Kamal v. Eden Creamery, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2023
- City of Bangor v. Citizens Communications Co.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2008
65 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.