Legal Opinion
Grinnell Mutual Reinsurance Co. v. City of Cokato
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided December 28, 1999No. C3-99-1169, C7-99-1238PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
EDWARD D. MULALLY, Judge. *
This is a consolidation of two appeals. The city and county appeal from summary judgment in which the district court ruled that, under Minn.Stat. § 466.07, they were required to indemnify their employees for claims resulting from work-related automobile accidents that were covered by the employees’ private insurance. The city and county contend that the liability coverage on the employees’ personal automobile insurance was primary.
FACTS
Haas v. Chambers v. County of Beltrami
On January 4, 1995, Bridget Haas was injured in a car accident while riding as a…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Hibbing Education Ass'n v. Public Employment Relations BoardSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1985
- Kellen v. MathiasCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1994
- Brandt v. StateCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1988
- Nisbet v. Hennepin CountyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1996
3Cited by1 opinion
- Kristin M. Schantzen v. Charlotte Erdmann, Valley Chiropractic Clinic, Ltd., ...Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2024