Kellen v. Mathias
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
AMUNDSON, Judge.
Appellant argues the district court erred in determining that a nonsettling defendant was released from liability where the settling defendants were vicariously liable for the acts of the nonsettling defendant.
We reverse and remand.
FACTS
Appellant David Kellen owns farmland in Traverse County and grows sugar beets. David and Daniel Miller own adjacent farmland and grow soybeans. Respondent John Mathias owns and operates an aerial chemical application service. In June 1991, the Millers contracted with Mathias to spray a chemical herbicide on their soybean crop.
Kellen…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Frost-Benco Electric Ass'n v. Minnesota Public Utilities CommissionSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1984
- Offerdahl v. University of Minnesota Hospitals & ClinicsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1988
- Pierringer v. HogerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1963
- Frey Ex Rel. Frey v. SnelgroveSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1978
- Loe Et Ux v. LenhardOregon Supreme Court · 1961
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Maloney v. VALLEY MEDICAL FACILITIES, INC.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2009
- Lake Superior Center Authority v. Hammel, Green & Abrahamson, Inc.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2006
- Vernet v. Serrano-TorresCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2009
- State v. WanzekNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1999
- Keator v. GaleNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1997
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.