Legal Opinion

ANDREW BROWN COMPANY v. Painters Warehouse, Inc.

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided February 6, 1975No. 11678PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HAYS, Justice.

Andrew Brown Company brought suit against Painters Warehouse (Painters) and Donald H. MacAfee and his wife on a $6,000 promissory note. The MacAfees had signed an endorsement of the Painters note. In connection with the suit, plaintiff sought the garnishment of two debtors of Painters, the Valley National Bank and National Retailers Corporation of Arizona. Pursuant to A.R.S. § 12-1571, plaintiff, by its attorneys, swore out an affidavit that the debt due was unpaid, that the defendants did not have property in the state sufficient to satisfy the debt, and that the garnishment…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. North Georgia Finishing, Inc. v. Di-Chem, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1975
  2. Commonwealth v. DavisTexas Supreme Court · 1942
  3. Nielson v. FlashbergArizona Supreme Court · 1966
  4. Jacob v. MinerArizona Supreme Court · 1948
  5. Arizona Podiatry Ass'n v. Director of InsuranceArizona Supreme Court · 1966

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Selby v. SavardArizona Supreme Court · 1982
  2. Tekai Corp. v. Transamerica Title Ins. Co.Colorado Court of Appeals · 1977
  3. Lemon v. Harlem Globetrotters International, Inc.District Court, D. Arizona · 2006
  4. Rubi v. Transamerica Title InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1981
  5. Copeland v. City of YumaCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1989

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API