Hub-Wyoming Oil Co. v. Watts
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
1Opinion of the CourtCochran, J.
Defendants in error commenced this action against the plaintiff in error to recover on 13 promissory notes and to foreclose a mortgage upon real estate securing the same. The defendant filed its cross-petition admitting the execution of the notes, but alleging that they were given as the purchase price for certain property and the plaintiffs had been guilty of fraudulent representations in the sale of the property, and asking for damages against the plaintiffs. • The plaintiffs recovered the full amount sued for, and the defendant has prosecuted this appeal.
The defendant complains of the…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Missouri, K. & T. Ry. Co. v. WestSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913
- Smith v. Pulaski Oil Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1922
3Cited by5 opinions
- Timmons v. Royal Globe Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1982
- Keahey v. CraigSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1939
- Yellow Cab Operating Co. v. SpelceSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1936
- Muskogee Electric Traction Co. v. BolinSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924
- Timmons v. Royal Globe Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1982