Legal Opinion

Hub-Wyoming Oil Co. v. Watts

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided April 3, 1923No. 11322PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCochran, J.

Defendants in error commenced this action against the plaintiff in error to recover on 13 promissory notes and to foreclose a mortgage upon real estate securing the same. The defendant filed its cross-petition admitting the execution of the notes, but alleging that they were given as the purchase price for certain property and the plaintiffs had been guilty of fraudulent representations in the sale of the property, and asking for damages against the plaintiffs. • The plaintiffs recovered the full amount sued for, and the defendant has prosecuted this appeal.

The defendant complains of the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Missouri, K. & T. Ry. Co. v. WestSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913
  2. Smith v. Pulaski Oil Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1922

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Timmons v. Royal Globe Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1982
  2. Keahey v. CraigSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1939
  3. Yellow Cab Operating Co. v. SpelceSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1936
  4. Muskogee Electric Traction Co. v. BolinSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924
  5. Timmons v. Royal Globe Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1982

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API