Legal Opinion
Niederlehner v. Weatherly
Ohio Court of Appeals
Decided April 12, 1943No. 6231 and 6235PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
By ROSS, P.J.
This is an appeal on questions of law from a judgment of the Court of Common Pleas of Hamilton County. The-plaintiff, guardian of David Mitchell, a lunatic, instituted an action in replevin against the Chief of Police of the city of Cincinnati, to secure certain specific currency totaling $6,190. The sheriff of .Hamilton County took possession.'of the money under the writ of replevin.
Three other claimants to the money intervened in the action and filed cross-petitions. The defendant, Chief of Police, filed an affidavit of interpleader, disclaiming any interest in the…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Heller v. New York, N. H. & H. R.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1920
- Gratz v. McKeeCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1920
- Mitchell v. Oklahoma Cotton Growers Ass'n.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1925
3Cited by4 opinions
- Bishop v. EllsworthAppellate Court of Illinois · 1968
- Staphan L. Koserkoff, and Cross-Appellant v. Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Company, and Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1970
- Niederlehner, Gdn. v. WeatherlyOhio Court of Appeals · 1946
- Smith v. SmithNew York Court of Appeals · 1954