Legal Opinion

City of New Orleans v. O'Neil

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided December 15, 1891No. 10,837PublishedCited by 6 opinions

APPEAL from the Second Oity Oourt of New Orleans. Lavillebeuvre, J.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Breaux, J.

The city sued to recover a license tax from the following named defehdants:

Charles Garvey, Muir & Fromberg, T. O’Neil, Albert Thiesou and J. R. Turk, claiming that they were each liable as “ master builders.”

The defendants answered that they were following a mechanical pursuit, as carpenters, during the year for which license is demanded.

They also alleged that they are exempt, under Article 206 of the Constitution, from the payment of a license. .

There is an agreement of record in accordance with which these cases were submitted in one…

2Cited by6 opinions

  1. State v. Up-To-Date Shoe Repairing Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1932
  2. White Cleaners & Dyers v. HughesDistrict Court, W.D. Louisiana · 1934
  3. State v. TungSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1935
  4. State v. C. C. Hartwell Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1906
  5. State v. Crescent City Laundries, Inc.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1936

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API