Legal Opinion

State v. Tung

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided July 1, 1935No. 33371PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ROGERS, Justice.

The defendant, Charles Tung, doing business as the Oriental Laundry, appeals from a judgment condemning him to pay an occupational license tax for the years 1933 and 1934, with interest, penalties, and costs. The judgment was rendered in a suit brought by the state tax collector for the city of New Orleans under section 25 of Act No. 190 of 1932, levying a license tax on “every individual, firm, association or corporation carrying on the profession or business of steam dyeing, steam cleaning, steam pressing, or the business of steam or electric laundering.” The defendant does…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. State v. Up-To-Date Shoe Repairing Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1932
  2. State v. Chicago Hat WorksSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1932
  3. State v. McNallySupreme Court of Louisiana · 1893
  4. City of New Orleans v. O'NeilSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1891
  5. City of New Orleans v. PohlmannSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1893

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Western Co. v. SheppardCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1944
  2. McDowell v. DavisCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1968
  3. State v. Crescent City Laundries, Inc.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1936
  4. State v. Banner Cleaners & Dyers, Inc.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1936
  5. State v. LevySupreme Court of Louisiana · 1938

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API