Haynes v. State
Court of Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
ONION, Justice (Retired).
This is an appeal from a conviction for evading arrest. Following a plea of nolo contendere before the court, appellant’s punishment was assessed at fifty (50) days confinement in the county jail.
The appellant advances two points of error. First, he contends he was denied his guaranteed right to the effective assistance of counsel under the Sixth Amendment to the United States Constitution. Secondly, appellant urges he was denied due process of law because the plea arrangement was reached in a judge’s presence and in his absence. We will reverse the judgment and…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Hill v. LockhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Hernandez v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1986
- Ex Parte DuffyCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1980
- Ex Parte WelbornCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1990
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by37 opinions
- Miranda v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)1999
- Carmona v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1994
- Toupal v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)1996
- Keiser v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1994
- Diaz v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District1995
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.