Legal Opinion
Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. Smith
California Court of Appeal
Decided August 5, 1919No. Civ. No. 2924PublishedCited by 5 opinions
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtSloane, J.
The plaintiff filed a complaint in equity to enjoin the prosecution of a large n'umber of suits instituted against it by the defendant, and to compel their litigation in a single action. Demurrer to the complaint was sustained, and the plaintiff refusing to amend, judgment was given for the defendant. This appeal is by the plaintiff from the judgment refusing the equitable relief prayed for and dismissing the action. The questions on appeal, therefore,» go to the sufficiency of the complaint to entitle the plaintiff to relief.
The facts set out in the complaint and as admitted under demurrer…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Smyth v. AmesSupreme Court of the United States · 1898
- Smyth v. Ames; Smyth v. Smith; Smyth v. HigginsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1898
- City of Chicago v. CollinsIllinois Supreme Court · 1898
- Third Ave. R.R. Co. v. . the Mayor, Etc., of N.Y.New York Court of Appeals · 1873
- Southern Steel Co. v. HopkinsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1911
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Franklin & Franklin v. 7-Eleven Owners for Fair FranchisingCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2000
- Verdier v. VerdierCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1962
- Bartholomew v. BartholomewCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1942
- Associated Plumbing Contractors of Marin Etc. Counties, Inc. v. FW Spencer & Son, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1963
- Home Finance Co. v. BalcomNevada Supreme Court · 1942