Baron Tube Co. v. United States
United States Customs Court
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Lawrence, J.
In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the items marked “A” consist of seamless steel oil-well casings, not advanced beyond hammering, rolling, or casting, similar in all material respects to those the subject of United Supply & Mfg. Co., The Crispin Company v. United States (37 Cust. Ct. 95, C.D. 1804), the claim at one-tenth of 1 cent per pound was sustained. The items marked “B,” stipulated to consist of seamless steel oil-well casings, advanced beyond hammering, rolling, or casting, the same as those involved in Humble Oil & Refining Co. et al. v. United…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Humble Oil & Refining Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1954
- United Supply & Mfg. Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1956