Humble Oil & Refining Co. v. United States
United States Customs Court
1Opinion of the Court
Lawrence, Judge:
This cause of action arose at the port of Houston, Tex., by virtue of three protests, which are enumerated in the schedule of protests attached to and forming part of this decision. They were filed pursuant to the provisions of § 1583, United States Code, title 28, and consolidated for the purposes of trial and decision.
Certain imported articles, described in the record as “seamless A. P. I. casings” (or by similar descriptive terms), of various diameters, lengths, and weights, were classified for duty by the collector of customs in accordance with the provision in paragraph…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Simon, Buhler & Baumann (Inc.) v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1918
- Winkler-Koch Engineering Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1953
3Cited by24 opinions
- United Supply & Mfg. Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1956
- American Mannex Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1966
- Humble Oil & Refining Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1958
- John A. Steer Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1966
- Amerada Petroleum Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1954
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.