Legal Opinion

State v. Mallory

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided December 21, 1972No. 1 CA-CR 415PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

STEVENS, Presiding Judge.

In this appeal, after a plea of guilty to an amended information, the defendant-appellant raises a single question as follows:

“Is the information sufficient to support a guilty plea to grand theft when it does not show any description of the property alleged to be taken or state its value?”

FACTUAL BACKGROUND

The background for the charges in question are thoroughly set forth in the reporter’s transcript of the preliminary hearing. It is thereby established that on, and for some time prior to 22 June 1971, Joseph Ruscione was a coin dealer engaged in business at a…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. State v. KuhnleyArizona Supreme Court · 1952
  2. State v. MillerArizona Supreme Court · 1966
  3. State v. CorveloArizona Supreme Court · 1962
  4. State v. CutshawCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1968
  5. State of Arizona v. BenhamArizona Supreme Court · 1941

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Hyder v. SUPERIOR COURT, ETC.Arizona Supreme Court · 1981
  2. State v. BruceArizona Supreme Court · 1980
  3. State v. RogersArizona Supreme Court · 1976
  4. State v. HurseyArizona Supreme Court · 1993
  5. Commonwealth v. ArdolinoSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1982

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API