Legal Opinion

State of Maine v. Macie N. Jones

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Decided January 25, 2018No. Docket: Aro-17-166PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGorman, J.

[¶ 1] Macie N. Jones appeals from a judgment of conviction for unlawful trafficking of a schedule W drug (Class B), 17-A M.R.S. §§ 1102(1)(A), 1103(1-A)(A) (2017), entered by the trial court (Aroos-took County, Stewart, J.) after a jury trial. Jones argues that 17-A M.R.S. § 1112 (2017) is facially unconstitutional and that the court’s admission of a lab certificate in lieu of live witness testimony pursuant to that statute was a violation of her right of confrontation. We conclude that section 1112 is facially constitutional, and we affirm the judgment.

I. BACKGROUND

[¶ 2] Viewing the evidence…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Crawford v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  2. Johnson v. ZerbstSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  3. Melendez-Diaz v. MassachusettsSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  4. Maryland v. ShatzerSupreme Court of the United States · 2010
  5. Weaver v. Pennsylvania Board of Probation & ParoleCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1997

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State of Maine v. Clifton ThomasSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2025
  2. State of Maine v. Ross S. AdamsSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2019
  3. State of Maine v. Rochelle GleasonSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2025

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API