Legal Opinion
Pritsker v. Soyferman
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided September 18, 2000PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
—In an action to recover damages for breach of an oral contract, the plaintiffs appeal, as limited by their brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Rappaport, J.), dated June 28, 1999, as granted the defendants’ respective cross motions for summary judgment dismissing the complaint on the grounds that the action was barred by the Statute of Frauds and release.
Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with one bill of costs payable to the respondents appearing separately and filing separate briefs.
The plaintiffs gave the defendants $100,000 toward…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Rocanova v. Equitable Life Assurance Society of United StatesNew York Court of Appeals · 1994
- Booth v. 3669 Delaware, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1998
- A. Aversa Brokerage, Inc. v. Honig Insurance Agency, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
3Cited by5 opinions
- Kohanowski v. BurkhardtNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2012
- Delaney v. DelaneyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
- Wassner v. Bais YaakovAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
- Hersko v. HerskoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2026
- Hersko v. HerskoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2026