Finn v. Virginia Retirement System
Supreme Court of Virginia
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Hassell
I
The primary issue we consider in this appeal is whether Code § 2.1-526.8 confers upon a former trustee of the Virginia Retirement System (VRS) a right of indemnification against the Commonwealth for legal fees he incurred to defend criminal investigations that allegedly arose out of the performance of his official duties.
n.
Mark T. Finn, a former trustee of the VRS, filed an amended bill of complaint seeking indemnification from the Commonwealth of Virginia, the VRS, William E. Landsidle, Comptroller, and RF&P Corporation. Finn alleged in his amended bill that he is entitled to…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- McGowan v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
- Federal Communications Commission v. Beach Communications, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Heller v. Doe Ex Rel. DoeSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Hodel v. IndianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Exxon Corp. v. EagertonSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- In Re PhillipsSupreme Court of Virginia · 2003
- Covel v. Town of ViennaSupreme Court of Virginia · 2010
- Tanner v. City of Virginia BeachSupreme Court of Virginia · 2009
- Gray v. Com.Supreme Court of Virginia · 2007
- Black v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia · 2001
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.