Legal Opinion

In re Harris

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided September 17, 1999No. 99-B-1828PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ATTORNEY DISCIPLINARY PROCEEDINGS

hPER CURIAM.*

This attorney disciplinary proceeding arises from two counts of formal charges filed by the Office of Disciplinary Counsel (“ODC”) against respondent, Michael A. *1173Harris, an attorney licensed to practice law in Louisiana. The charges allege respondent’s conduct violates Rules 1.3 (lack of diligence), 1.4 (failure to communicate with a client), 1.5(a) (fee arrangements), 1.5(f)(6) (failure to refund an unearned fee), 1.16(d) (termination of the representation), 3.4(c) (knowing disobedience of an obligation under the rules of a tribunal), 8.1(b)…

2Cited by15 opinions

  1. In re WelcomeSupreme Court of Louisiana · 2003
  2. In re LacobeeSupreme Court of Louisiana · 2004
  3. In re BonnetteSupreme Court of Louisiana · 2001
  4. In re DunnSupreme Court of Louisiana · 2002
  5. In re ThorntonSupreme Court of Louisiana · 2004

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API