Legal Opinion
I.A.M. National Pension Fund, Benefit Plan A v. Wakefield Industries, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
Decided February 11, 1983No. 81-1883PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
FAIRCHILD, Senior Circuit Judge.
Plaintiffs appeal the vacating of a civil contempt order issued against the president of defendant corporation for failure to comply with an injunction directed to defendant and its officers. The appeal raises the questions whether there was sufficient service of the summons on defendant and whether there was sufficient service of the civil contempt motion on the president.
Defendant Wakefield Industries, Incorporated is a Connecticut corporation. It is a wholly owned subsidiary of Norwich Electronics, Inc., which in turn is a wholly owned subsidiary of Capehart…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Perkins v. Benguet Consolidated Mining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1952
- Kulko v. Superior Court of Cal., City and County of San FranciscoSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Data Disc, Incorporated v. Systems Technology Associates, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1977
- Cannon Manufacturing Co. v. Cudahy Packing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1925
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Combs v. Adkins & Adkins Coal Co., Inc.District Court, District of Columbia · 1984
- Melvin D. Reuber v. United States of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1986
- I.A.M. National Pension Fund, Benefit Plan A v. Wakefield Industries, IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1983