Legal Opinion

State v. Scott

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided February 24, 1982No. 81-136PublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLocher, J.

I

This cause presents one issue; whether the trial court properly entered a verdict of guilty against appellant under R. C. 2925.03, which provides:

“(A) No person shall knowingly do any of the following:
“(1) Sell or offer to sell a controlled substance in an amount less than the minimum bulk amount as defined in section 2925.01 of the Revised Code. * * * ” (Emphasis added.)

Appellant argues that the judgment of the trial court is erroneous because he did not transfer a controlled substance. We disagree. Appellant’s position would require that this court engraft an additional element of proof to…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Rose v. LockeSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  2. State v. MarianOhio Supreme Court · 1980
  3. State v. MosleyOhio Court of Appeals · 1977

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. State v. MughniOhio Supreme Court · 1987
  2. State v. ChandlerOhio Supreme Court · 2006
  3. State v. SwayOhio Supreme Court · 1984
  4. State v. PattersonOhio Supreme Court · 1982
  5. Gonzales v. WolfeCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2008

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API