Legal Opinion

McClaskey v. Barr

U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern Ohio

Decided November 10, 1891PublishedCited by 10 opinions

In Equity. Suit for partition of lands.

1Opinion of the CourtSage, J.

This cause is now before the court on questions arising with reference to the settling of the decree, a draft by complainants’ counsel having been submitted, and also a written statement and brief on behalf of the defendants in possession, suggesting their objections and certain modifications desired by them.

The first objection is to the statement in the introductory paragraph of the complainants’ draft that “this cause came on to be heard at the *131term of April, to-wit, tlie 19tb day of May, A. I). 1891.” This states merit is in accordance with the fact. The cause was heard on the 19th of May.…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Brine v. Insurance Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1878
  2. York Company v. Central RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1866
  3. Blackburn v. CrawfordsSupreme Court of the United States · 1866
  4. Connecticut Mutual Life Insurance v. CushmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1883
  5. German v. MachinNew York Court of Chancery · 1837

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Farmers' Loan & Trust Co. v. Denver, L. & G. R.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1903
  2. Larkin Packer Co. v. Hinderliter Tool Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1932
  3. Rowe v. HillCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1914
  4. United States v. GoldsteinCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1921
  5. Brandt v. ScribnerArizona Supreme Court · 1910

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API