Kar v. Hogan
Michigan Court of Appeals
1DissentHolbrook, J.
This writer must dissent. This decision is the result of many troubled hours of consideration and reconsideration.
A review of the record presently before us reveals a trial of confused and difficult facts. This writer would be hard pressed to find that he would have been required to have reached a different result than the trial judge or that he would have been required to reach a different result than that of the jury had he been the trial chancellor. Were it not for the ill-advised statement by the trial judge following the presentation of plaintiffs’ proofs, this writer could…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Goldberg v. KellySupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Fuentes v. ShevinSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Boddie v. ConnecticutSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Bell v. BursonSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Sniadach v. Family Finance Corp. of Bay ViewSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.