Legal Opinion

Diamond Hill Gin Co. v. Swift & Co.

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided May 14, 1921No. 12138PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Complaint; from Banks superior court — Judge Cobb. January 8, 1921.

1Opinion of the CourtHill, J.

The Diamond Hill Gin Company sued Swift & Company on an account for $707 worth of cottonseed which they alleged they had sold to the defendants through one Dock Carr, agent of the defendants. The evidence failed to show that Dock Carr was a general agent of the defendants. If there were circumstances that might have authorized the inference that he was a special agent for the purpose of buying and shipping cottonseed to the defendants, the evidence clearly and indisputably proved that his agency for this purpose was limited to the purchase of cottonseed, and in every instance to paying for it…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. McCandless v. Inland Acid Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1902
  2. Americus Oil Co. v. GurrSupreme Court of Georgia · 1902
  3. Chapman v. Americus Oil Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1903

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Bruce v. Calhoun First National BankCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1975
  2. Browning v. American & Overseas Travel Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1982
  3. Jewell v. MartinCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1942
  4. W. & J. Sloane Selling Agents Inc. v. Tampa Chair & Table Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1936
  5. Jewell v. MartinCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1942

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API