Legal Opinion
Chung v. Hair Trend USA, Inc.
Court of Appeals of Georgia
Decided June 26, 2013No. A13A0706PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BARNES, Presiding Judge.
The trial court in this case granted summary judgment to Hair Trend USA, Inc. (“Hair Trend”) in this suit on account, but because the appellants’ motion to dismiss for lack of venue has not been ruled *430on, we vacate the order and remand the case for further proceedings consistent with this opinion.
Hair Trend filed an action for suit on an account against Koo Pil Chung and Mae Hwa Chung d/b/a Beauty Mart (“appellants”) in the State Court of Sumter County on February 15, 2012. Hair Trend was unsuccessful in its attempt to serve the appellants in Sumter County. Thereafter,…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Focus Healthcare Medical Center, Inc. v. O’nealCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2002
- Chancey v. HancockSupreme Court of Georgia · 1969
- Williams v. WillisCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1992
- Neely v. JonesCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2003
- Morgan v. BerryCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1979
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Republic Title Company, LLC v. Andrews.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2018
- Georgia Department of Human Services v. Dougherty County, GeorgiaCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2015
- ROSS Et Al. v. WATERSCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2015
- Alr Oglethrorpe, LLC v. Fidelity National Title Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2019
- Republic Title Company, LLC v. Annie B. AndrewsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2020