Legal Opinion

Ex Parte Hunter

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided September 16, 2009No. PD-1047-08PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court 1

OPINION

2Opinion of the Court · PricePrice, J.

When it was discovered early in the course of the appellant’s trial for aggravated sexual assault that one of the jurors had served on the grand jury that originally indicted him, the trial court sua aponte declared a mistrial. The Texarkana Court of Appeals, with one justice dissenting, held that the State’s attempt to try the appellant a second time following the mistrial violated double jeopardy. 1 We granted the State’s petition for discretionary review in order to decide whether the State satisfied its burden to establish manifest necessity for the mistrial.

Since we granted…

3Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Rheinlander v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1996
  2. Whitmire v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1997
  3. State v. McCaffreyCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2002
  4. State v. Curl, Jerry Wayne, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District2000
  5. Ex Parte Hunter, Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)2008

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

4Cited by7 opinions

  1. Leonard Pierson, Jr. v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)2013
  2. Brown, David EarlCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2014
  3. Anthony Lamar Harvey v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)2012
  4. Ex parte PerezCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2017
  5. Brown, David EarlCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2014

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API