Legal Opinion

Rowland v. Dillingham

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided May 15, 1903PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Appeal by the defendant, William G. Dillingham, from a final order of the Municipal Court of the city of New York, dispossessing the defendant in summary proceedings.

1Opinion of the Court

Jenks, J. :

The applicant for the removal states in the petition that he is the agent for Huntingdon, who is the executor and trustee of the last will and testament of Emma Hart, deceased, and there is postilled a clause from her will as follows: “ I hereby authorize and empower my executor hereinafter appointed, as soon as practicable after my death, to sell and dispose of all the real estate of which I may die seized and possessed, and to give good and sufficient deeds of the same.” The applicant also states that he entered into an agreement with the defendant as tenant.

I think that this is…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Tilyou v. . ReynoldsNew York Court of Appeals · 1888
  2. People on rel. Ward v. KelseyNew York Supreme Court · 1862

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Reich v. . CochranNew York Court of Appeals · 1911
  2. Fitzgerald v. WashingtonCivil Court of the City of New York · 1975
  3. Slater v. Waterson & Law Amusement Co.Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1908
  4. Cappel v. LondonAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1909
  5. Baker v. Citizens' Trust Co.New York Supreme Court · 1909

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API