Cappel v. London
Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York
Reargument of an appeal by the tenant from a final order in favor of the landlord, rendered in the Municipal Court of the city of New York, second district, borough of Manhattan.
1Per curiam
Upon the hearing of this appeal our attention was not called to the fact, that the petition herein, in addition to setting forth that the petitioner was the agent of the plaintiff, who was the “ landlord ” of the demised premises, also contained the further allegation “ that the petitioner as the agent of such landlord on or about the first day of April entered into an agreement with Meyer London as tenant and that, by the terms of such agreement, the said tenant hired from the said landlord the premises,” etc. This must be held to be a sufficient statement of the “ interest ” of the…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Rowland v. DillinghamAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1903
- Slater v. Waterson & Law Amusement Co.Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1908
3Cited by2 opinions
- Reich v. . CochranNew York Court of Appeals · 1911
- Siegelstein v. AuslanderAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1911