United States v. Chattin
U.S. Navy-Marine Corps Court of Military Review
1Concurring in part, dissenting in partLawrence, Judge
I concur in holding that a prosecution under clause 3 of Article 134, Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ), 10 U.S.C. § 934, is not barred because the same conduct may be prosecuted as a violation of a regulation or order under Article 92, UCMJ, 10 U.S.C. § 892. To accept such a *806proposition would not only frustrate congressional intent in including clause 3 in Article 134 but would severely restrict military commanders in regulating conduct that is similar to that proscribed by Federal penal statutes. This case perfectly illustrates the point. Federal penal statutes do not prohibit every…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Moskal v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- United States v. Samuel Loring Morison, the Washington Post Cbs, Inc., Amici CuriaeCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1988
- United States v. EppsUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1987
- United States v. FeltyUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1982
- United States v. HubbardUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1989
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.