Joseph Horne & Co. v. Petty
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Appeal, No. 153, Jan. T., 1899, by plaintiff, from judgment of C. P. Fayette Co., June T., 1898, No. 43, on verdict for defendant on feigned issue. Feigned issue.
Read the full summary
Appeal, No. 153, Jan. T., 1899, by plaintiff, from judgment of C. P. Fayette Co., June T., 1898, No. 43, on verdict for defendant on feigned issue. Feigned issue. The case was tried before the court without a jury, under the Act of April 22, 1874, P. L. 109. The facts sufficiently appear by the opinion of Mestrezat, P. J., as follows : FINDINGS OE EACT. 1. In 1895 R. J. Linton, W. E. Frazer, Jr., and W. Y. Parkinson entered into a partnership for the sale of certain coal lands in Fayette county, Pennsylvania. At No. 338, September term, 1896, of the court of common pleas of Allegheny county,…
1Opinion of the Court
Pee. Cublam,
By agreement of parties to this feigned issue, trial by jury was waived and the case submitted to the decision of the court below. From its judgment in defendant’s favor this appeal was taken by the plaintiff company, who in its specifications of error complains of the learned trial judge’s finding of fact, conclusions of law, etc.
Our consideration of the record, with special reference to each of these specifications, has failed to convince us that there is any error therein that would justify us in sustaining either of them. On the contrary, we are all of opinion that there is no…
2Cited by12 opinions
- Edmundson's EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1918
- Dinger v. FriedmanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1924
- King v. LemmerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1934
- Rankin v. CulverSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1931
- First National Bank v. GerliSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1909
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.