Legal Opinion

Haynes v. Ford

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided August 25, 2004No. 22749PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtZinter, Justice

(on reassignment).

[¶ 1.] Mary Haynes appeals from a circuit court decision overruling a Department of Labor ruling that Haynes was permanently and totally disabled and entitled to workers’ compensation benefits. We affirm the circuit court.

Facts and Procedural History

[¶ 2.] Mary Haynes was diagnosed with mild mental retardation predating this case. She worked at several jobs after finishing high school, but they were all short-lived. She was unemployed from October 1995 to March 1997, but then *659started a program at the Black Hills Workshop, a non-profit organization that provides employment…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Steinberg v. South Dakota Department of Military & Veterans AffairsSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2000
  2. Petersen v. Hinky DinkySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1994
  3. Enger v. FMCSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1997
  4. Johnson v. Albertson'sSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2000
  5. Spitzack v. Berg Corp.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1995

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Darling v. West River Masonry, Inc.South Dakota Supreme Court · 2010
  2. Kassube v. Dakota LoggingSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2005
  3. Vollmer v. Wal-Mart Store, Inc.South Dakota Supreme Court · 2007
  4. McDowell v. CitibankSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2007
  5. Meligan v. Department of Revenue & RegulationSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2006

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API