Haynes v. Ford
South Dakota Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtZinter, Justice
(on reassignment).
[¶ 1.] Mary Haynes appeals from a circuit court decision overruling a Department of Labor ruling that Haynes was permanently and totally disabled and entitled to workers’ compensation benefits. We affirm the circuit court.
Facts and Procedural History
[¶ 2.] Mary Haynes was diagnosed with mild mental retardation predating this case. She worked at several jobs after finishing high school, but they were all short-lived. She was unemployed from October 1995 to March 1997, but then *659started a program at the Black Hills Workshop, a non-profit organization that provides employment…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Steinberg v. South Dakota Department of Military & Veterans AffairsSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2000
- Petersen v. Hinky DinkySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1994
- Enger v. FMCSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1997
- Johnson v. Albertson'sSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2000
- Spitzack v. Berg Corp.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1995
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Darling v. West River Masonry, Inc.South Dakota Supreme Court · 2010
- Kassube v. Dakota LoggingSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2005
- Vollmer v. Wal-Mart Store, Inc.South Dakota Supreme Court · 2007
- McDowell v. CitibankSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2007
- Meligan v. Department of Revenue & RegulationSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2006
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.