Anderson v. SeaWorld Parks & Entertainment, Inc.

ORDER DENYING REMAND

SAMUEL CONTI, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

I. INTRODUCTION

The Court turns now to a motion by Plaintiffs to remand this case to State Court. ECF No. 15 (“Mot.”). The motion challenges the original notice of removal,1 *1159is fully briefed,2 and is appropriate for resolution without oral argument pursuant to Civil Local Rule 7-l(b). For the reasons set forth below, the motion is DENIED.

II. FACTS

This case includes both the facts alleged in the First Amended Complaint, ECF No. 9-1 (“FAC”), and an unusual procedural history that has followed. As to the former, certain individuals…