Legal Opinion

Priest v. Chenault

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided March 14, 1940No. 8 Div. 20PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

THOMAS, Justice.

The appeal is from a decree overruling the demurrers to the bill as amended and the denial of the motion to abate the instant suit.

The right of removal of an administration of an estate from the probate court to a court of equity having venue of such matters is declared by statute. Michie’s Code, §§ 6478, 8102; Pierce v. Barbaree, Adm’x, 238 Ala. 676, 193 So. 115; Dent v. Foy et al., 204 Ala. 404, 85 So. 709; Ashurst v. Ashurst, 175 Ala. 667, 57 So. 442.

This bill is filed by the personal representative of decedent’s estate for discovery, against the husband, a large claimant,…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Foster v. NapierSupreme Court of Alabama · 1883
  2. Kaplan v. ColemanSupreme Court of Alabama · 1912
  3. Harris v. Town of Tarrant CitySupreme Court of Alabama · 1930
  4. Ashurst v. AshurstSupreme Court of Alabama · 1912
  5. Upshaw v. EubankSupreme Court of Alabama · 1933

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Sessions v. Jack Cole CompanySupreme Court of Alabama · 1963
  2. Fegaro v. South Central BellSupreme Court of Alabama · 1971
  3. Hudson & Thompson v. First Farmers & Merchants National BankSupreme Court of Alabama · 1957
  4. Moore v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1985
  5. Sessions v. Jack Cole CompanySupreme Court of Alabama · 1963

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API