Legal Opinion
Iowa Supreme Court Attorney Disciplinary Board v. Rauch
Supreme Court of Iowa
Decided March 21, 2008No. 07-0957PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
STREIT, Justice.
The Iowa Supreme Court Attorney Disciplinary Board (“Board”) accused Allan Rauch of practicing law while his license was suspended, deceiving a client and the district court, neglecting a client’s matter, failing to account for and refund a portion of a client’s retainer, and failing to cooperate with the Board’s investigation. The Grievance Commission of the Supreme Court of Iowa (“Commission”) found Rauch violated the Iowa Code of Professional Responsibility for Lawyers and recommended revocation of Rauch’s license in light of his prior ethical violations. We agree with the…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Iowa Supreme Court Board of Professional Ethics & Conduct v. LettSupreme Court of Iowa · 2004
- Committee on Professional Ethics & Conduct of the Iowa State Bar Ass'n v. RogersSupreme Court of Iowa · 1981
- Iowa Supreme Court Board of Professional Ethics & Conduct v. GrotewoldSupreme Court of Iowa · 2002
- Iowa Supreme Court Attorney Disciplinary Board Vs. James W. McgrathSupreme Court of Iowa · 2006
- Iowa Supreme Court Attorney Disciplinary Board v. RickabaughSupreme Court of Iowa · 2007
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Iowa Supreme Court Attorney Disciplinary Board v. PlumbSupreme Court of Iowa · 2009
- Iowa Supreme Court Commission on the Unauthorized Practice of Law v. Raymond William SullinsSupreme Court of Iowa · 2017
- Amended July 10, 2017 Iowa Supreme Court Commission on the Unauthorized Practice of Law v. Raymond William SullinsSupreme Court of Iowa · 2017
- Iowa Supreme Court Attorney Disciplinary Board Vs. Van PlumbSupreme Court of Iowa · 2009