Hanson v. Kent & Purdy Paint Co.
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Error from District Court, Oklahoma County; John J. Carney, Judge. Action by the Kent & Purdy Paint Company against S. E-Hanson and another for a money judgment on account.. Judgment for plaintiff, and defendants bring error.
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
ROBERTSON, C.
Counsel for plaintiffs in error urge four assignments of error as grounds for reversal in in this case; the first being error of the trial court in excluding testimony offered by plaintiffs in error relative to an alleged collateral agreement between plaintiff in error S. E. Planson and defendant in error, the same being a part of the entire transaction between said plaintiff in error, S. E. Hanson, and defend ant in error, and to the effect that said S. E..Hanson, under his contract with defendant in error, could make sales on credit and make due report of said sales…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Terrapin v. BarkerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1910
- Great Western Mfg. Co. v. Davidson Mill & Elevator Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1910
- Ward v. RichardsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1911
- Lynn v. JacksonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1910
- Leavitt v. DeichmannSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1911
3Cited by5 opinions
- Smicklas v. SpitzSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1992
- Jones v. EpplerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1953
- Midland Valley Railroad Co. v. PettieSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1945
- Cantrell v. HenthornSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1981
- Cantrell v. HenthornSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1981