Legal Opinion

Town of Brownsburg, Indiana v. Fight Against Brownsburg Annexation

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided June 5, 2019No. Supreme Court Case 19S-PL-342PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Slaughter, Justice.

In this municipal-annexation case, we hold that a trial court hearing a remonstrance proceeding on judicial review must consider the evidence submitted by both the municipality and the remonstrators. The trial court need not defer to either the municipality's own evidence supporting the annexation or its determination that it met the statutory requirements. Whether the annexation was lawful is a legal question for the trial court. If the court enters special findings of fact and conclusions of law, appellate courts are to apply the standard of review provided in Trial Rule…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Johnson & Graham's Lessee v. McIntoshSupreme Court of the United States · 1823
  2. United States v. Jeff BoydCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1995
  3. Yanoff v. MuncyIndiana Supreme Court · 1997
  4. Spranger v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1995
  5. ESPN, Inc. and Paula Lavigne v. University of Notre Dame Police DepartmentIndiana Supreme Court · 2016

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. CHINS: B B v. Indiana Department of Child ServicesIndiana Court of Appeals · 2025
  2. City of Bloomington, Monroe County, Indiana v. County Residents Against Annexation, Inc., an Indiana not for profit corporationIndiana Court of Appeals · 2025
  3. County Seat Bakery, LLC v. Sakura KJ Japanese Restaurant, LLC (mem. dec.)Indiana Court of Appeals · 2020
  4. David Buck v. Samaron Corporation (mem. dec.)Indiana Court of Appeals · 2020
  5. Eric Holcomb, in his official capacity as Governor of the State of Indiana v. City of BloomingtonIndiana Supreme Court · 2020

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API