Legal Opinion

Eastern Shopping Centers, Inc. v. Contro

New York Supreme Court

Decided November 10, 1971PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFrederick B. Bryant, J.

In -this action to foreclose a mortgage the plaintiff seeks summary judgment on the grounds that there are no triable issues of fact and no merit to the defenses and *141counterclaim asserted in the answer. The mortgage in question was executed by the defendants, Charles Contro and Albert Gr. Shulman, on August 16, 1966 in pursuance of a contract of sale of real property entered into between the parties on July 12, 1966. The mortgage was for a total of $156,000 with interest at 6%, interest only to be payable quarterly until December 31, 1969, at which time the entire balance was to become due…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Real Estate Trust Company v. . KeechNew York Court of Appeals · 1877
  2. Matter of Accounting of ConsalusNew York Court of Appeals · 1884
  3. Ganz v. . LancasterNew York Court of Appeals · 1902
  4. Church v. . MaloyNew York Court of Appeals · 1877
  5. President & Directors of the Manhattan Co. v. RudnerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1952

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Eikenberry v. Adirondack Spring Water Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1985
  2. Dichter v. Viking Office Products, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1986
  3. Millican v. New York & Suburban Federal Savings & Loan Ass'nNew York Supreme Court · 1977

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API