Legal Opinion
Christenberry Trucking & Farm, Inc. v. F & M Marketing Services, Inc.
Court of Appeals of Tennessee
Decided March 31, 2010No. E2009-01325-COA-R3-CVPublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
CHARLES D. SUSANO, J„
delivered the opinion of the Court,
in which HERSCHEL P. FRANKS, P.J., and JOHN W. McCLARTY, J., joined.
Christenberry Trucking & Farm, Inc., initiated this litigation against F & M Marketing Services, Inc., with a complaint seeking a declaration that Christenberry had not contracted to pay F & M a commission on loads Christenberry hauled for UPS/Dell Computer (“the UPS/Dell account”). F & M filed an answer and counterclaim asking for a determination that there was a contract with respect to the UPS/Dell account under which Christen-berry was obligated to pay F & M a…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Kaiser Steel Corp. v. MullinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Kelly v. KosugaSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
- Eastman Chemical Co. v. JohnsonTennessee Supreme Court · 2004
- In Re Adoption of A.M.H.Tennessee Supreme Court · 2007
- Northern Indiana Public Service Company, an Indiana Corporation v. Carbon County Coal Company, a PartnershipCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1986
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- City of Goodlettsville v. Priceline.com, Inc.District Court, M.D. Tennessee · 2012
- MGM Construction Services Corp. v. Travelers Casualty & Surety Co. of AmericaDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2011
- Debbie West, Individually and as the Surviving Spouse of William P. West v. AMISUB (SFH), Inc., d/b/a St. Francis HospitalCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 2013
- F&M Marketing Services, Inc. v. Christenberry Trucking and Farm, Inc.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 2015