Legal Opinion
In Re Adoption of A.M.H.
Tennessee Supreme Court
Decided January 23, 2007No. W2004-01225-SC-R11-PTPublishedCited by 177 opinions
1Opinion of the Court 1
OPINION
2Opinion of the Court · BarkerWilliam M. Barker, C.J.
in which JANICE M. HOLDER, CORNELIA A. CLARK, and GARY R. WADE, JJ„ and ADOLPHO A. BIRCH, JR., Sp.J., joined.
This case concerns the termination of parental rights. The appellants, who are the parents, seek reversal of the termination of their parental rights to the care and custody of their daughter, A.M.H. The trial court predicated the termination on the ground that the parents abandoned A.M.H. by willfully failing to visit her for four months. First, we hold that the statute of repose under section 36 — 1—113(q) of the Tennessee Code Annotated does not deprive this Court of…
Also in this document: Per curiam.
3Cases cited19 opinions
- Owens v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 1995
- In Re ValentineTennessee Supreme Court · 2002
- State v. FlemmingTennessee Supreme Court · 2000
- Jones v. GarrettTennessee Supreme Court · 2002
- Hawk v. HawkTennessee Supreme Court · 1993
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by177 opinions
- Betty Saint Rogers v. Louisville Land CompanyTennessee Supreme Court · 2012
- Curtis Myers v. Amisub (SFH), Inc., d/b/a St. Francis HospitalTennessee Supreme Court · 2012
- In Re Bernard T.Tennessee Supreme Court · 2010
- In Re: Kaliyah S.Tennessee Supreme Court · 2015
- In Re Angela E.Tennessee Supreme Court · 2010
172 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.