Legal Opinion

Commercial National Bank In Shreveport v. Calk

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided February 28, 1968No. 2232PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CULPEPPER, Judge.

This is a suit by ordinary process for the balance due on a promissory note and recognition of a chattel mortgage securing same, through the seizure and sale of a “trencher” machine. The defense is a failure of consideration due to the defective condition of the machine for whose purchase the note was given. The issue is whether the plaintiff bank is a holder in due course and as such immune from this defense. From an adverse judgment on the merits, the plaintiff appealed.

There is little, if any, dispute as to the facts. On February 22, 1966, the defendant, Mr. J. C. Calk of…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. White System of New Orleans, Inc. v. HallSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1951
  2. Maxwell v. W. B. Thompson & Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1932
  3. Rex Finance Company v. CaryLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1963
  4. Rex Finance Company v. CarySupreme Court of Louisiana · 1963
  5. Commercial Credit Corp. v. SetliffLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1950

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Asian Intern. v. MERRILL LYNCH, PIERCE, ETC.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1983
  2. Schwegmann Bank & Trust Company of Jefferson v. Cecil R. SimmonsCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1989
  3. Republic of Texas Sav. Ass'n v. FIRST, ETC.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1982
  4. Calk v. Highland Construction & Manufacturing, Inc.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1979
  5. Robco, Inc. v. CONSOLIDATED SEWERAGE, ETC.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1981

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API