Legal Opinion

Calk v. Highland Construction & Manufacturing, Inc.

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided January 31, 1979No. 6786PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CULPEPPER, Judge.

The issue on appeal in this case is whether an attorney at law has a special privilege for the amount of his professional fees, under LSA-R.S. 9:5001, where the suit is settled by a compromise agreement, and judgment is rendered dismissing the client’s suit.

The present case originated as a suit for damages for personal injuries by the plaintiff, J. C. Calk, against the alleged defendant tort feasors, General Electric Company, et al. Commercial National Bank in Shreveport held a prior judgment against J. C. Calk for the balance due on a promissory note. See 207 So.2d 578. The…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Roberts v. Hanover Ins. Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1976
  2. Smith v. Vicksburg, S. & P. Ry. Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1904
  3. American Bank & Trust Co. v. ByronLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1977
  4. State v. NixSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1914
  5. Commercial National Bank In Shreveport v. CalkLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1968

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Coutee v. BrunsonCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1993
  2. Security First National Bank v. BrunsonCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1993
  3. Calk v. Highlands Construction & Manufacturing, Inc.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1979
  4. Security First National Bank v. BrunsonCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1993

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API