Legal Opinion
Liberty Mutual Insurance v. Friedman
District Court, D. Maryland
Decided December 28, 1979No. Civ. K-77-2045PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
FRANK A. KAUFMAN, District Judge.
Plaintiffs, three related insurance companies (Liberty), 1 seek a declaratory judgment defining their status under Executive Order 11246 (E.0.11246) 2 and the regulations pro mulgated thereunder by the Department of Labor’s Office of Federal Contract Compliance Programs. 3 Defendants (the Government) are federal government officials who have been assigned various responsibilities under the Executive Order. 4 That Order requires government contractors and subcontractors to establish affirmative action employment programs, to file with the Government certain…
2Cases cited38 opinions
- Griggs v. Duke Power Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Udall v. TallmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Alexander v. Gardner-Denver Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Williamson v. Lee Optical of Oklahoma, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1955
- Burlington Truck Lines, Inc. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- 24 Fair empl.prac.cas. 1168, 24 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 31,457, 28 cont.cas.fed. (Cch) 81,027 Liberty Mutual Insurance Company, Liberty Mutual Fire Insurance Company, and Liberty Mutual Life Assurance Company of Boston v. Everett Friedman, Chief of the Insurance Compliance Staff, Social Security Administration F. Ray Marshall, Secretary of Labor, United States Department of Labor Weldon J. Rougeau, Director, Office of Federal Contract Compliance Programs James Cardwell, Commissioner, Social Security AdministrationCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1981
- City and County of Denver v. CasadosSupreme Court of Colorado · 1993
- City and County of Denver v. CasadosSupreme Court of Colorado · 1993
- Liberty Mutual Insurance v. FriedmanCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1981