Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

Liberty Mutual Insurance v. Friedman

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Decided January 9, 1981No. 80-1078Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in partButzner, Circuit Judge

I concur in Parts I and III of the court’s opinion to the extent that they set forth the *173factual and legal background of this case. I also concur in Part II which holds that workmen’s compensation policies issued to government contractors are subcontracts within the meaning of the regulations that implement Executive Order 11,246.

I dissent from the conclusion reached in Parts IV and V of the court’s opinion holding that there is no congressional authority for imposing the requirements of Executive Order 11,246 on Liberty Mutual Insurance Company.

The reasons for my dissent can be stated…

2Cases cited7 opinions

Eugene Farmer v. Philadelphia Electric CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1964
Adam Farkas v. Texas Instrument, Inc. And Ling-Temco-Vought, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1967
The Contractors Association Of Eastern Pennsylvania v. The Secretary Of LaborCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1971
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. NEW ORLEANS PUBLIC SERVICE, INC., Defendant-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1977
Northeast Construction Co. v. RomneyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1973

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.