Legal Opinion

Deschodt v. Deschodt

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided October 23, 1894PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Appeal from the St. Louis City Circuit Court.—Hon. Daniel Dillon, Judge.

1Opinion of the CourtRombauer, P. J.

The plaintiff and defendant claim respectively a divorce on the ground of desertion. Upon the trial such proceedings were had that the *103court dismissed both the petition and cross bill. From this decree the defendant alone appeals.

The testimony adduced at the trial was mainly that of the opposing parties, and hence is conflicting in many respects. The corroborated testimony of the witnesses was very meager, and related mostly to minor matters. In such a case we must defer to the findings of the trial court, unless'we are satisfied that the uncontradicted testimony of the appellant,…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Hoffman v. HoffmanSupreme Court of Missouri · 1869
  2. Owen v. OwenMissouri Court of Appeals · 1892
  3. Messenger v. MessengerSupreme Court of Missouri · 1874
  4. Guthrie v. GuthrieMissouri Court of Appeals · 1887
  5. Kaster v. KasterMissouri Court of Appeals · 1890

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Hupp v. Hupp and WarrenMissouri Court of Appeals · 1946
  2. Grenzebach v. GrenzebachMissouri Court of Appeals · 1906
  3. Ulrey v. UlreyMissouri Court of Appeals · 1899
  4. Kilpatrick v. KilpatrickMissouri Court of Appeals · 1899

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API