Legal Opinion

Hoffman v. Hoffman

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided March 15, 1869PublishedCited by 32 opinions

Appeal from St. Louis Circuit Court. The facts sufficiently appear in the opinion of the court. The court will review the evidence in a divorce suit, and reverse where the decree is not justified by the evidence. (Lewis v. Lewis, 5 Mo. 278 ; Nagel v. Nagel, 12 Mo. 55 ; Oliver v. Oliver, 20 Mo. 261.) Where, in a divorce suit, it appears in evidence that neither party has been injured, both the bill and cross-bill should be dismissed. (12 Mo. 53, 157.)

1Opinion of the CourtBliss, Judge

The plaintiff filed his petition in the St. Louis Circuit Court for a divorce from his wife, the said Barbetta, making the allegations of residence, marriage, good behavior, and charging that the defendant, wholy unmindful of her duty as a dutiful and affectionate wife of the plaintiff, left and abandoned this plaintiff on or about the 11th day of April, 1860, without any good reason *548for so doing, and has continued to live separate from him since that time. The defendant admits the leaving, denies the good conduct of the plaintiff, and says that his conduct was such to herself and her…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Nagel v. NagelSupreme Court of Missouri · 1848
  2. Ryan v. RyanSupreme Court of Missouri · 1845
  3. Freeland v. FreelandSupreme Court of Missouri · 1854

3Cited by32 opinions

  1. Wadsworth v. WadsworthCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
  2. Reddington v. ReddingtonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1945
  3. Owen v. OwenMissouri Court of Appeals · 1892
  4. Dwyer v. DwyerMissouri Court of Appeals · 1885
  5. Paulsen v. PaulsenSupreme Court of Iowa · 1951

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API